10 Decades, 10 Questions for ...

Martim Brion

© Dieter Hammer

Martim Brion, born in 1986 in Lisbon, lives and works in Munich. For more information, visit the artist's website.

__________


In one sentence: What is Concrete Art for me?
A concept of Abstract Art, defined by a manifesto.

Do I see myself as a representative of Concrete Art?
No, I think I am influenced by Concrete Art, but I am not an artist of Concrete Art.

Who is my favorite artist in the field of Concrete Art? Which position in Concrete Art was particularly formative or impressive for me? Which pioneers of Concrete Art do I see as role models?
The artists who have influenced me the most are Theo van Doesburg, Piet Mondrian, Günter Fruhtrunk and Max Bill.

What was my first contact with Concrete Art?
I heard the term Concrete Art for the first time when I moved to Germany. I knew many of the artists associated with the movement, but I hadn't heard the term itself or read the manifesto.

Have the early days of Concrete Art had a direct influence on my own work as an artist?
In terms of the manifesto itself, not really. In relation to the artworks that were created in connection with the manifesto, definitely.

Which principles of Concrete Art have shaped my artistic approach most?
I would say that I believe that art is universal in that it permeates every existing culture on the planet. And the idea that its expression should be clear and simple appeals to me, as I believe that any form of expression and communication should include these points.

Color, form, or line? Which fundamental form of artistic expression from Concrete Art is most important to me?
I would say that all areas are interconnected and therefore cannot be pigeonholed. However, if I had to choose, it would be color.

The manifestos of the pioneers of Concrete Art are for me

  1. Long-since outdated
  2. As valid as ever today
  3. Much too dogmatic x
  4. Of no relevance at all
  5. Pioneering for their time
  6. Still a source of inspiration
  7. Not radical enough
  8. Other assessments:


On the hundredth anniversary: Where do I see Concrete Art in another hundred years?

  1. The movement within fine art that sets the tone
  2. No longer recognizable as a clearly distinguishable art movement of its own x
  3. Still of great importance
  4. In forms and media that cannot be predicted yet x
  5. Other assessments:
     

And? Is the term Concrete Art still necessary (at all)?
It must be used with regard to its historical meaning and value. As a current definition or concept of art, it is outdated and no longer relevant. It will always be linked to other concepts and ideas, as most art today is a plexus of past concepts in combination with new concepts. It has always been like that, but now it can be said with confidence that concepts evolve in this way – step by step –, and therefore always contain a little bit of the past, present and ideas for the future.


Translated from German.